Farmers Elevator Company of Alvarado

About Us
FECA Services
Cash Bids
Grower Incentive

Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
California Seeks Drought Advice        05/25 09:25

   SYDNEY (AP) -- California has turned to the world's driest inhabited 
continent for solutions to its longest and sharpest drought on record.

   Australia, the land poet Dorothea Mackellar dubbed "a sunburnt country," 
suffered a torturous drought from the late 1990s through 2012. Now Californians 
are facing their own "Big Dry," and looking Down Under to see how they coped.

   Australia also faced tough water restrictions --- along with dying cattle, 
barren fields and monstrous wildfires that killed 173 people. But when the 
rains finally returned, Australians had fundamentally changed how they handle 
this precious resource. They treat water as a commodity to be conserved and 
traded, and carefully measure what's available and how it's being used. 
Efficiency programs cut their average daily use to 55 gallons, compared with 
105 gallons per day for each Californian.

   The lesson: long droughts are here to stay, so societies had better plan 
ahead, says drought-policy expert Linda Botterill of the University of Canberra.

   "We can expect longer, deeper and more severe droughts in Australia, and I 
believe the same applies in the U.S.," Botterill says. "As a result, we need to 
develop strategies that are not knee-jerk responses, but that are planned 
risk-management strategies."

   California water officials now routinely cite Australia's experience. 
Felicia Marcus, who runs California's Water Resources Control Board, can 
describe the stormwater-capture system watering soccer fields in Perth in 
minute detail.

   But Californians may find Australia's medicine tough to swallow.

   Australians are accustomed to living in a dry land, expect government 
intervention in a crisis and largely support making sacrifices for the common 
good. For much of their history, many Californians have enjoyed abundant water, 
or were able to divert enough of it to turn deserts green, and lawyers make 
sure property rights remain paramount.

   From an Australian perspective, California's drought response has been 
"absolutely pathetic," says Daniel Connell, an environmental policy expert at 
The Australian National University.

   Australia's drought response was hardly perfect, and some of its gains might 
be slipping away, but Americans suffering their own "Big Dry" may benefit from 
some comparisons:



   AUSTRALIA: Overuse and drought had depleted Australia's main river system, 
which winds across four states that produce a third of the nation's food, and 
ran so low by 2002 that the Murray River had to be dredged to reach the sea. 
The government capped entitlements, canceled inactive licenses, bought back 
hundreds of billions of gallons from irrigators and strictly metered usage to 
make sure license holders use only their allocation. Availability now affects 
price as shares are traded on an open market worth $1.2 billion a year in U.S. 

   The water that farms, industries and towns get depends on what's in the 
river; in drought, it can dwindle to virtually nothing. But entitlements can be 
bought and sold, keeping agriculture afloat. A farmer of a thirsty crop like 
cotton might not profit when both water and cotton prices are low. But if an 
orchard grower in desperate need buys that water, the cotton farmer can live 
off the sale while the orchard owner reaps a profitable harvest.

   CALIFORNIA: Nearly 4,000 so-called senior water rights holders who staked 
claims before 1914 or own acreage abutting a river or stream get priority. In 
drought, authorities must completely deny water to most other claimants before 
they touch the water of these senior water-rights holders. San Francisco has 
stronger water rights than many other cities because in 1902, Mayor James 
Phelan hiked up the Sierra Nevada and tacked a water claim to an oak tree along 
the bank of the Tuolumne River. Gov. Jerry Brown calls the system "somewhat 

   "Revising the water-rights system is a thermo-nuclear issue in California," 
said John Laird, California's secretary for natural resources, but if water 
shortages go on, "almost everything has to be on the table."



   AUSTRALIA: Thousands of gauges across Australia measure rainfall, 
authorities in each state and territory measure surface water at stream gauging 
stations, and underground water is monitored through a complex process 
involving the drilling of bores and controlled pumping tests. Water data 
collection agencies report to the federal Bureau of Meteorology, which 
publishes the data online.

   CALIFORNIA: The legislature last year required monitoring to be phased in 
gradually, eventually showing for the first time how much groundwater is being 
pumped. But roughly a quarter-million California households and businesses 
still lack water meters, and aren't required to until 2025. The state relies on 
an honor system: Rights holders self-report their use of river and stream water 
every three years. Gov. Brown's budget proposed last week would require 
monitors and annual usage reports.



   AUSTRALIA: All major cities imposed limits or bans on watering lawns and 
washing cars, and inspectors fined rule-breakers. Public-service campaigns and 
water-saving appliances also reduced household water use from 85 gallons per 
person per day in 2000 to 55 gallons per person today.

   CALIFORNIA: After voluntary cutbacks were ignored, Brown's administration 
mandated a statewide 25 percent cut in water use by cities and towns, and 
ordered more farmers to stop pumping from rivers and streams. Marcus said the 
one piece of advice that seemed universal in both Australia and California "was 
conserve, conserve, conserve, as early as you can, because it's the cheapest, 
most economical way to buy time" while tougher water-saving measures are phased 



   AUSTRALIA: Australians began conserving long before their drought. In 1995, 
Sydney's water authority was ordered to slash per-capita demand by 35 percent 
by 2011, and it met that target by reducing pressure and leaks in pipes, 
boosting businesses' water efficiency, and offering low-cost, water-saving 
technologies in homes, such as dual-flush toilets, low-flow showerheads and 
rainwater tanks for gardens, toilets and laundry. With government rebates, 
these devices became common across Australia.

   Such efficiency measures can be implemented quickly, economically and 
easily, says Stuart White, an Australian sustainability expert who has advised 
Californians on drought response. "In some cities, it's quite possible we would 
have reached death's door if it hadn't been in place."

   CALIFORNIA: Communities across California offer rebates on drought-friendly 
plumbing and appliances, and a growing number of local ordinances are being 
rewritten to allow families to recycle water from rains and from showers. But 
the rooftop-rain collectors, stormwater cisterns and bathwater-recycling for 
gardens common in Australia remain rarities.



   AUSTRALIA: Billions were spent on desalination plants in major cities, and 
many are not operating because cheaper water is now available in Australia, 
prompting critics to dismiss them as expensive and power-hungry flops that will 
create greenhouse gases and worsen the continent's climate-change woes. 
Supporters say the plants will protect the country from the next inevitable 

   CALIFORNIA: Brown has called for conservation while focusing on an 
ambitious, $17 billion plan, opposed by environmental groups, to build 39 miles 
of tunnel to take Northern California water to Southern California's bigger 
farmers. Desalination plants also are envisioned: San Diego's would be the 
biggest in the Western Hemisphere.  


Home   Product   Services   About   Contact
Copyright 2006 Farmers Elevator Company of Alvarado